Fedora 16 ( 64 bits )

I use to play with fedora since it split from redhat. That time i know how to deal with yum ( fedora package manager ) but not much. Now i do task in ubuntu and have apt-get to be a short sword. Today I found some good article about top 10 linux distros. I saw fedora bring something interesting up again. So I got fedora16 (64 bit) in my virtualbox. At the end I found myself trying to find something like build-essential ( ubuntu ) from yum. That's why I have to wrote down in this post. To get something like that I have to


>> su - # to be root, traditional way of fedora:)
>> yum install yumex 
 Arrh then you can have something like ubuntu software manager, let's go to development topics then click !!!


*** let's try
>> yum install binutils gcc make patch libgomp glibc-headers glibc-devel kernel-headers kernel-devel

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Difference between apt-get update and apt-get dis-upgrade

The “sudo apt-get upgrade” isn’t necessary. It’s a different type of upgrade from “dist-upgrade” You either run one or the other. “apt-get upgrade” will only update your existing packages while “apt-get dist-upgrade” will update your existing packages, remove obsolete packages and install new available packages as well. You can get breakages either way since new packages might be required as dependencies for upgraded packages in the case of “sudo apt-get upgrade” so using “apt-get dist-upgrade” is still the best way so far. Note: This only applies to LMDE since LMDE is a true rolling release. For any other flavor of Mint you’d use MintUpdate levels 1, 2 and 3 all the way. Perhaps someday Clem and Co. will figure out how to tailor MintUpdate so it works properly in LMDE but considering the rolling aspect of LMDE, I’m at a loss as to how theyn would do that. ref http://b10gger.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/difference-between-apt-get-upgrade-and-apt-get-dist-upgrade/ (thank for this website)
Read more